Friday, July 27, 2007

Franco Is Still Dead, and Housing Is Still Bust: Caroline Baum

Courtesy of Bloomberg.com
By Caroline Baum

Foreclosure resolutions ad displayed in front of a home July 27 (Bloomberg) -- The latest round of housing statistics -- sales, starts, homebuilders' outlook surveys and earnings reports -- offered little hope that residential real estate would be back on its feet anytime soon.

``Housing is bust, and wishful thinking cannot unbust it anytime soon,'' says Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics in Valhalla, New York.

Just to recap what we learned this week: New home sales plunged 6.6 percent in June to 834,000, just above the seven- year low set in March. Sales are down 22 percent from a year earlier, even with builders throwing in the kitchen sink to sweeten incentives and lighten the load (inventories).

Home resales fell 3.9 percent last month to 5.75 million, a five-year low. They're down 11 percent in the last 12 months.

The only surprise is that prices haven't fallen more. The median price of an existing home was unchanged from a year earlier while new home prices fell 2.2 percent, removing the refinancing/cash-out option for strapped homeowners but not much of a real loss given soaring home prices from about 2001 through 2005.

Shepherdson warns against taking any comfort in the stabilization in home prices for two reasons: one, the deterioration in the supply picture; and two, the lack of adjustment in median prices for either seasonal variations or the mix of properties sold from one month to the next.

Because most of the problems have been in the subprime and Alt-A sectors, and because non-prime borrowers probably buy lower-priced homes, ``their absence from the market will limit the speed of the decline in the median home price,'' he says.

`Challenging'

Moving along to the builder side, things are equally glum. (The outlook is ``challenging,'' in homebuilder speak.) Six U.S. homebuilders, including D.R. Horton Inc. and Pulte Homes Inc., reported losses in the second calendar quarter this week. The chief executives of these companies were not optimistic about the rest of this year. Many weren't optimistic about next year either. Homebuilders' stock prices, which early this year saw a housing renaissance, plunged, with the Standard & Poor's Supercomposite Homebuilding Index dropping to a three-year low.

Yet the real blow this week seemed to come from someone outside the homebuilding industry. Countrywide Financial Corp., the biggest U.S. mortgage lender, did to the stock market this week what HSBC Holdings Plc did to the subprime loan market back in February. Countrywide's road-side bomb, delivered with its second-quarter earnings report, was news that the stress in the home-loan market was spreading from deadbeats to folks with good credit histories.

Rising delinquencies on mortgage payments on prime loans contributed to the company's third consecutive quarterly loss and a one-day 10 percent loss in its stock price.

Technology Redux

On top of rising late payments, Chief Executive Officer Angelo Mozilo said on a conference call that the U.S. was experiencing ``home price depreciation almost like never before, with the exception of the Great Depression.''

The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 226 points, or 1.6 percent, following the news, and another 312 points yesterday.

``We've been looking at the same data on housing for months, and it took the CEO of a lender to make everyone say, ouch,'' says Joe Carson, director of global economic research at AllianceBernstein in New York.

Carson says Mozilo's comments were not unlike those of Cisco Systems Inc. CEO John Chambers when technology companies woke up in late 2000/early 2001 to find their order books had evaporated (at least that's when companies owned up to it).

Chambers rattled the stock market in early 2001 when he admitted that the previous quarter had been ``a little bit more challenging than expected.''

Visibility, Hindsight

One year earlier, when capital spending and the economy were plowing headfirst into a brick wall, Chambers said he had ``never been more optimistic about the market opportunities for our industry as a whole and for Cisco within that market.''

Just call it visibility in hindsight.

While everyone from the Federal Reserve chairman to the Treasury secretary has been talking housing containment, the damage has started to seep out from under the foundation and spill over to other parts of the economy. Home improvement retailers such as Home Depot and Lowe's Cos. are feeling the pinch. Consumer spending slowed markedly in the second quarter. Wall Street is having trouble finding buyers for loans to finance leveraged buyouts. Investors are starting to reprice risk.

The yield curve has inverted again as the yield on the 10- year Treasury plummeted 50 basis points in the last six weeks.

Rerun Time

Haven't we seen this movie before? Every bubble has a credit kicker when the price of whatever asset folks were chasing stops rising. Banks find religion when it comes to making new loans. Regulators step in to make sure there will be no repeat of the last bubble. Consumers save more; businesses invest less.

Housing has been the economy's weakest link for some time, subtracting about 1 percentage point from growth in every quarter from the second quarter of 2006 through the first quarter of 2007.

Residential investment, as it's referred to in the gross domestic product accounts, may not be the real threat to the U.S. economy. The danger lies in the fact that ``there's a lot more household debt associated with housing'' than there was with the stock-market bubble, Carson says.

Maybe you can take housing out of the economy for analytical purposes (see ``GDP ex-housing''). But when it comes to the real world, the two are inextricably linked.

(Caroline Baum, author of ``Just What I Said,'' is a columnist for Bloomberg News. The opinions expressed are her own.)

To contact the writer of this column: Caroline Baum in New York at cabaum@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: July 27, 2007 00:03 EDT

Monday, July 23, 2007

The housing market: How bad will it get?

Part 1: Midyear housing update
Monday, July 23, 2007

By Glenn Roberts Jr.
Inman News

Editor's note: How bad will the real estate market get before it gets better? Inman News compiles the facts and analysis in this five-part series.

Speculation, rampant building, risky loans, overborrowing and escalating prices propelled the housing market to an unprecedented peak -- and are now counted among its greatest failings.

The "soft landing" that so many analysts and economists had predicted has given way to a record number of foreclosures, an implosion in the subprime lending market, an oversupply of housing, and home-price declines in many market areas. The dreamy days of the housing boom have received a cold slap of reality.

Real estate markets are historically cyclical -- that's nothing new. But in this case, the nation is in the midst of a downturn following a long-lasting and massive real estate run-up, and it remains to be seen whether this period will become known as one of the greatest real estate slumps in history.

How bad will the real estate market get before it gets better? Many experts have said they don't expect a quick return from these doldrums, and this outlook could turn dire if the overall U.S. economy hits a snag. While there is not a nationwide epidemic of job loss, there are worries about rising inflation and energy prices, and declining consumer spending.

David Shulman, of the Anderson Forecast at the University of California, Los Angeles, said in his latest report that he expects a 10 percent peak-to-trough home-price decline that could extend into 2009, with the swell of foreclosures growing "well into 2008." His forecast report bears a one-word title: "Turbulence."

Real estate industry consultant John Burns said during a housing conference in May that the buyer's market will continue for at least two more years, and "we're heading into a year with more price declines," with builders dropping prices by about 20 percent in some markets.

The National Association of Home Builders expects a 21 percent drop in total housing starts and an 18 percent drop in new-home sales this year compared to last year, and the National Association of Realtors expects a 4.6 percent drop in existing-home sales, a 1.3 percent drop in median existing-home prices and a 2.3 percent drop in new-home prices this year compared to 2006.

'Market-fed downturn'

The sensational rise of the housing boom may be a key factor in its demise.

"This was sort of a market-fed downturn," said Jay Q. Butler, director of Realty Studies at Arizona State University's Morrison School of Management and Agribusiness. The rapid upswing in home sales and pricing was not sustainable, he said.

"A lot of the system was being stretched, both legally and illegally to some degree, with the idea that this was going to continue. So people got in over their heads. It really sort of turned in on itself. You usually find a (real estate) downturn associated with a downturn in the economy -- we really haven't seen the downturn in the economy."

Likewise, the latest annual housing market report by Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies stated that the housing downturn "has been driven largely by the market's own excesses," including an oversupply of new homes that was artificially inflated by activity among investors and speculators.

Some familiarities exist now from past cycles, Butler said. For example, in a real estate boom there are always people who overextend themselves financially to purchase homes during a real estate boom, perhaps thinking that they will be able to sell the home for a profit based on the appreciation trends.

"I don't think we really ever learn. The lenders and real estate agents and everybody else is more than willing to help people achieve this goal (of home ownership) because they make a commission for you to achieve this goal," Butler said.

But the housing market's stellar performance leading up to the downturn was unique, he said, in featuring historically low interest rates, a massive subprime market, and the Wall Street concept of packaging mortgages and selling them off.

It may take awhile for the market to return to the bustling days of the boom, Butler said, and he expects a gradual recovery. The home-price bubble that took on air in some markets has gone away, he said, and more normal conditions seem to be prevailing.

In Arizona, "all the markets that were well above normal are returning to more of what would be expected of the housing market," he said, noting that the state is home to a high tide of foreclosures in comparison to other states.

The inventory of for-sale homes remains bloated, he said, and will take awhile to work off. The population centers that are farthest away from the job centers will face the toughest challenges, he said, as long commutes, inadequate transportation systems and rising energy costs are working against housing sales in those markets.

While some home builders reported that they were taking steps to avoid sales to speculators and overbuilding, the strategy wasn't 100 percent effective, Butler added. "They claimed that they were stopping the investor by multiple means -- that they were only selling to people who qualified for homes. Then it ... appeared that maybe they weren't doing what they were saying they were doing. I've seen booms and busts before, and home builders always seem surprised (by the downturn)."

Public home-building company Lennar Corp., in its latest quarterly earnings report, reported a second-quarter net loss of $244.2 million, and KB Home reported a $148.7 million loss for the same quarter. Builder Pulte Homes announced a net loss of $85.7 million and MDC Holdings announced a net loss of $94.4 million in the latest earnings reports this year, and other builders, too, have announced quarterly net losses this year to the tune of tens of millions of dollars.

Foreclosures climbing

Meanwhile, foreclosure rates are soaring, according to foreclosure data companies and the Mortgage Bankers Association. The association reported last month that the rate of loans entering the foreclosure process in first-quarter 2007 reached a record high, due mostly to increases in Florida, Nevada, California and Arizona. An estimated 1.28 percent of all loans outstanding were in a foreclosure process at the end of the first quarter, the trade group reported, and the delinquency rate jumped 43 basis points compared to last year's rate while dropping 11 basis points compared to fourth-quarter 2006.

Ohio, Indiana and Michigan accounted for 19.9 percent of the nation's loans in foreclosure during the quarter -- the region is notable for significant job losses. Foreclosures data company RealtyTrac reported a 90 percent jump in foreclosure filing sin May compared to the same month last year, for a rate of one foreclosure filing for every 656 U.S. households.

A surge in proposed condo projects and apartment-to-condo conversions has slowed, said Richard Swerdlow, CEO for Condo.com, a Web site that features information about for-sale condo properties. "You're not going to see this giant overbuild again. It's hard to image that you'd see in the next decade what we just saw," he said.

The rush to build condos led to speculation and oversupply in some markets. Swerdlow noted that in some markets prospective buyers camped in front of a development site for the chance to buy units.

"Real estate brokers and the developers were in almost a ticket-collecting mode. They were processing orders because there was so much business to go around. Now that sort of investor phenomenon has gone away," he said. "That phenomenon has stopped."

Some investors who bought multiple units hoping for a profitable sale are now returning them to the market as rental units, he said, and some projects never got off the ground or have converted to apartment buildings. In hindsight, some apartment-to-condo conversion projects may have been better off as apartment buildings, Swerdlow said.

There are still projects that are being built, he said, though far fewer new development proposals these days. "In the next six to 12 months we'll see a lot of the projects being completed. We don't have a sense of what the market will look like until those projects (are completed), as it's uncertain whether all of the condo sales of units in those developments will successfully close.

Lending rules for condo buyers have tightened in an effort to screen out speculators from end-user occupants, he said, and international interest in U.S. condos may help to work off any oversupply.

Steve Jacobson, president for Fairway Independent Mortgage Corp., a brokerage with 105 branch offices that handled $1.6 billion in loan volume last year, said that there is definitely fear in the industry, as a wave of loans are scheduled for a reset in rates in the next six to 12 months.

The variety of high-risk loan products "got away from a make-sense standpoint," and contributed to the current market problems, he said. "As long as inflation stays low and unemployment stays low we should be able to come back," he said of the down market. "I don't see us going down to a deep depression."

Lessons learned?

The lesson to be learned from this market cycle is that there was "way too much flexibility" in the loan products offered to consumers, which ultimately led some consumers to buy homes that they couldn't afford, Jacobson said. "Sometimes that's not the right house ... they may not like what they hear but that's the right answer."

What makes this market cycle different than previous cycles, he said, is that the economy is far more globally dependent today.

Author and mortgage banker Richard Cohen, said that a contributor to the market's problems is that too many people have shopped for a house like it's a commodity, and he said it's up to the industry to remind consumers that there can be disastrous consequences for home purchases that do not pencil out financially. "It's part of our culture to buy stuff, and it's even more part of our culture to own your own home. How do you tell someone, 'You are not supposed to buy a home because you can't afford it and it's going to hurt you, potentially'?"

He said he would support a giant banner with a statement to consumers: "Stop going out and shopping like it's a bottle of catsup." He added, "There are a lot of people who are encouraging people not to do the right thing. During those boom years there were a lot of people getting into programs that were risky for them as well as the lender (and) were putting people really on the margin," he said.

While the rising foreclosure rate has been making headlines, Cohen said the story that is less told is about all of the people who are forced to sell to avoid foreclosure and end up as renters again.

Bill Lyons, founder and CEO for LEI Financial, a mortgage and real estate company based in San Diego, Calif., said he expects that prices must stabilize and the interest rates for short-term and adjustable loans must drop or there could be a "major blow up in early to mid-'08" in the real estate market. If one of the two does not happen there will be a blow up that will make the subprime blow up look like a firecracker compared to a scud missile," he said, as option-ARM loan sales peaked in mid-2005 and borrowers may find themselves upside down in the coming year.

Easy credit days over

This real estate cycle will certainly be remembered for its abundance of unconventional mortgage products, said Neil B. Garfinkel, a real estate and banking lawyer who serves as a lawyer for the Real Estate Board of New York, a real estate trade association for New York City's building industry. "We probably saw more creativity in mortgage products than we ever have before," he said.

While Garfinkel said the Manhattan real estate market is "always a strong marketplace," some of the Outer Burroughs are seeing properties sit longer on the market. "There is less of an urgency in the marketplace. Two years ago, the marketplace was crazy."

In those days, for-sale properties were moving almost immediately, but that has changed. "The mortgage market is certainly not helping them right now," he said, as credit restrictions have made it more difficult for people to qualify for a home purchase." Garfinkel, like some other industry officials, said he blames the media, in part, for instilling fears about the real estate marketplace. "I think it does affect people -- it's almost like a self-fulfilling prophecy."

While people had been using their home equity as a piggy bank, that scenario is less likely now, Garfinkel said. And rising interest rates could be "really problematic" when coupled with credit tightening -- if interest rates rise up to 9 percent, for example, it "would really push people over the top," he said.

The "easy credit" environment that preceded the downturn makes this housing cycle unique, said Joseph Ventura, president of William Tell Financial Services in Latham, N.Y., which offers mortgage, insurance and other financial services.

The problems stemming from this easy credit "should last about another 12 months until everything is 'washed' out of the cycle, allowing common sense to return to the lending market," Ventura said.

If unsold home inventory levels off for several months in a row that may be the first sign of a market recovery, he said. "Any interest rate rise will delay this phenomenon."

He shies away from labeling the housing market's boom and decline as a bubble. He said it's "more of a turning point in American personal finance history as the economy is relatively strong and unemployment and interest rates are at historically low levels -- this will keep things percolating."

Will any lessons be learned from this latest housing market cycle? "People unfortunately will always be attracted to bargains that are too good to be true, which in a nutshell has been what's happened with the latest mortgage debacle," he said. "Tighter lending laws may help but others will argue that easy credit has enabled many borrowers to successfully invest in home ownership."

While Ventura said that some fallout in the subprime market may be inevitable because it is by nature a high-risk business, he also stated that mortgage lenders that pass loans on to Wall Street firms "are often less responsible to whom they lend," as they may "operate in a virtually risk-free environment since they generally do not 'hold' the loan for a long period."

***

Friday, July 13, 2007

Foreclosure damage to be worse than expected

Real Estate Articles from Inman News
Mortgage market commentary
Friday, July 13, 2007

By Lou Barnes
Inman News

Mortgages are relatively steady in the 6.75-6.875 percent band, but they are the only semi-stable financial instrument out there. The money world is thrashing around, trying to identify the true extent of the housing/mortgage trouble.

June retail sales fell a surprise .9 percent -- maybe the often-forecasted, ultimate fade by consumers, maybe just a modest pullback from an outsize 1.5 percent gain in May.

Markets always oscillate across baseline, overdoing it one way, then another. However, the last year has been unusual in that all the lurching has had one cause, re-played again and again, one long Groundhog Day.

A year ago, as the Fed reached its current 5.25 percent, many bright and well-informed financial operators were just sure that the housing market would knock over the economy. Over and over and over again, the "just sure" bought bonds in anticipation of the recession to come, and within a week or a month were clobbered by resilient data.

Now it's changing. This week the rating agencies acknowledged error, and are re-rating with tougher methodology. That's the trigger for the two-part end-game: If we have huge losses, where are they? Who is exposed? And, if housing distress is as bad as it looks, where is the effect?

Part one, the mortgage losses. Very little money has been "lost." The market value of the securitized mortgages in question has fallen 30-70 percent, but if you don't sell, you don't have to recognize loss. The re-rating of this stuff to junk will force institutional investors to sell, to recognize, and probably depress value farther. We will also learn who has lost, and it's going to be an embarrassing and painful parade. This week, S&P, Moody's and Fitch downgraded no more than 1 percent of the trash outstanding; the outcome for the other 99 percent is sure as sunrise, the holders in frozen panic.

Market losses from forced sales are near, but there is still little actual credit loss from defaulted mortgages -- that's still ahead, and the loss magnitude will depend on the depth and length of the housing recession.

Part two, the housing market. Housing moves slowly, in an aching grind. Sellers resist discount, preferring to hold vacant, or to rent at a loss, or to stay put. Loan servicers are slow to foreclose: they are not staffed to do so (or to do anything except to send you all that mail trying to get you to buy insurance and pre-pay programs), fiddle endlessly and pretend to negotiate workouts of hopeless cases.

The housing picture is changing -- not selling, just changing. Foreclosure data is notoriously bad (every county and state has different procedures and law), but RealtyTrac's trend is probably about right, if only in consistency of error. The pattern is stark: national foreclosure filings are up 56 percent year-to-date, but mortgage defaults are up 86 percent -- foreclosure lag. Based on housing markets early to the distress party, Colorado the leading example, Bubble Zone foreclosures will increase for at least the next three years (announcements of bottom in 2008 are fantasy-based).

Do some math. Home resales run a tad over 6 million annually, plus another 1 million new-builds. Re-sellers still want to re-sell, and builders, desperate to unload land and to maintain survival volume, are still building at undercut prices. Demand is off (un-affordability and anxiety), but a new seller has arrived: first-half '07 foreclosure filings just short of 1 million. Pull-through from filing to foreclosure is unpredictable, but it looks as though re-sellers and builders will soon be joined by another million foreclosure re-sellers (or two, or three...). That's market saturation, not clearing.

We are going to get spillover into GDP. Book it. And we're going to see a serial credit panic. However, the disaster mongers are mistaken. Credit losses are distributed globally, and there is great long-term strength in housing (population growth, land scarcity, wealth...). The forecast here continues to be for a long period of flat prices in the Bubble Zones, but vastly more foreclosure damage from flat prices than previously modeled or imagined, the Great Hangover from the '01-'06 Mortgage Credit Party.

Lou Barnes is a mortgage broker and nationally syndicated columnist based in Boulder, Colo. He can be reached at lbarnes@boulderwest.com.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Featured Listing - 6143 Hilmar Drive, Westerville, OH 43082

Finding The Right Contractor -- Home Improvement Survey Points to the Best Ways

Wednesday July 11, 2:23 pm ET

How You Find Your Contractor Makes a Difference

GERMANTOWN, TN--(MARKET WIRE)--Jul 11, 2007 -- In a recently national study of 1,015 US homeowners, Consumer Specialists found that 66% of them had used a contractor for a home improvement project in the past. Overall levels of satisfaction were high with 76% saying that they were either extremely or very satisfied with the project. On a 7 point scale, the average rating was a 5.9 -- almost to the level of very satisfied.

It is the 5% who reported that they were very or extremely dissatisfied that we hear about. The question often raised is how to improve your odds of being one of the highly satisfied customers? According to this survey, how the contractor was located had a marked impact on homeowner's overall satisfaction with the project.

Those who used a contractor with whom they had previous personal experience were the most satisfied -- significantly besting all other methods of finding a contractor. Referrals from family, friends and neighbors placed second in satisfaction followed by getting a recommendation from another contractor.

Having the contractor supplied by a home improvement store, finding them in a telephone directory or via advertising turned out to be significantly less satisfying than the top two locating methods.

"Nothing beats personal knowledge or independent referrals to get the best results for home improvement projects," said Fred Miller, President of Consumer Specialists. "Surprisingly, those that used a home improvement store provided contractor did about the same as those that used advertising as they way they found their contractor."

This data comes from "In the Beginning," a special research project focused on understanding how homeowners approach that critical starting period in their projects. Included is the identification of three groups of consumers with different focuses to seeking information. They are (followed by the % of homeowners they represent): online (17%), personal network (23%) and contractor (23%) focused. The report on this study is available in a unique combined presentation/report format. For a more detailed release go to http://www.consumerspecialists.com/thebeginning.htm

Consumer Specialists is ten-year-old marketing consulting firm with a focus on the home improvement industry. The firm has industry studies for sale and does a broad range of custom research and consulting projects for its clients.

Contact:
For more information please contact:
Fred Miller
President, Consumer Specialists
(901) 757-5865

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

How to Invest in Preforeclosures

By Ralph Roberts
RISMEDIA, July 10, 2007

Some of the best bargains in the foreclosure market are actually in the preforeclosure market—weeks or even months prior to the time when the property ends up on the auction block. The earlier you can locate a distressed property or homeowners facing foreclosure, the less competition you have and the better your chances of ultimately acquiring the property at a great price. In this article, I cover the basics of investing in preforeclosures.

Networking for leads

The earlier you can find out about a property in preforeclosure, the better. You may even be able to discover properties before the foreclosure notice is posted. Choose the area where you want to buy preforeclosures and then network heavily in that area. Create your own business cards and hand them out to everyone you meet, and then network with people who are likely to have early leads:

- Real estate agents
- Foreclosure attorneys
- Divorce attorneys
- Bankruptcy attorneys
- Title companies
- Loan officers
- Reading the foreclosure notices

Call or visit your county’s register of deeds office and find out where the foreclosure notices are published. Usually, they’re published in the county’s legal news or one or more local newspapers. Find out where they’re published, and then subscribe to that publication. Each week, you should be reviewing the notices, marking promising candidates, and tracking any properties you marked during the previous weeks. (The foreclosure notice can change from week to week).

Foreclosure notices contain an assortment of valuable information, including the case or reference number; the insertion date; the county; the legal lot, subdivision, and city (which you can use to obtain the property address); the name of the mortgagor (usually the homeowners); the name of the mortgagee (the lender who’s foreclosing); the amount owed on the mortgage; the interest rate of the loan; the name and contact information for the lender’s attorney; the sale (auction) date; the length of the property’s redemption period (if any); and the liber (book) and page number of the recorded mortgage.

Tracking promising properties

As soon as you find out about homeowners who are or may be facing foreclosure, start tracking the property. If your discovered the property prior to the posting of the foreclosure notice, then contact the homeowners and work with them to keep track of where they stand in the foreclosure process. If you discovered the property by reading the foreclosure notices in your county, then use the following schedule to track the property (you may need to adjust the schedule based on the process in your area):

Week 1: Find the first foreclosure notice or NOD (notice of default), do some preliminary research on the property (see the next section for details), send a letter to the homeowners introducing yourself and what you can do to be of assistance.

Week 2: Find the second foreclosure notice. If a notice does not appear, send a congratulations letter to the homeowners. If a notice does appear, review the title work, contact the homeowners by phone, knock on their door to attempt a face-to-face meeting, and send a second foreclosure letter. (Your second letter should convey a sense of growing urgency and let the homeowners know that the clock is ticking.)

Week 3: Find the third foreclosure notice. If a notice does not appear, send a congratulations letter to the homeowners. If a notice does appear, attempt to contact the homeowners by phone, do a little more research on the property, and send your third foreclosure letter, stressing the growing urgency. At this point, you should also contact the foreclosing lender’s attorney to find out if the property is still going to auction, what the opening bid amount is likely to be, whether they are considering adjournment, and if they have any additional background information about the property.

Week 4: Find the fourth (and probably final foreclosure notice). If a notice does not appear, send a congratulations letter to the homeowners. If the foreclosure notice does appear, drive by the house, take photos of it, and note whether the condition of the property has changed significantly; attempt to contact the homeowners by phone; send your fourth foreclosure letter, stating when the property is scheduled for sale; and organize your property dossier for the auction.

Building a property dossier

Part of the process of tracking a property consists of building a property dossier in which you organize all relevant information about the preforeclosure or foreclosure property you are interested in. Your property dossier should contain the following items:
8-by-10-inch photograph of the property taped to the front of the folder for quick reference.

The foreclosure notices:

- A foreclosure information sheet with all the details from the foreclosure notice and your research of the title, deed, and mortgage. (You can research these items at your county’s register of deeds office.)
- An exterior home inspection form. (You should always inspect all four sides of the property with your own two eyes and record your observations.)
- Neighborhood inspection, complete with photos.
- Information on any other properties that are listed for sale in the area, so you can track their sales prices and how long it took them to sell.
- A map showing the location of the property.
- The title commitment and 24-month history in the chain of title or the minimum last two recorded documents. (You can obtain this from a title company.)
- The last recorded first mortgage, so you know how much the homeowners currently owe on the property. (You can obtain this from the register of deeds office.)
- Records of other liens on the property, such as second mortgages, construction liens, and tax liens. Property tax liens are especially important, because if you buy the property, you’re responsible for paying any back property taxes. (This information should show up on the title commitment.)
- A copy of the deed with the current homeowners’ names. These names should match the names on the title. (You can obtain this from the register of deeds office.)
- The city worksheet on the property showing the history of the property. (Your city or town should have a worksheet on file for every property in the area.)
- The SEV (State equalized value). (You can obtain this from the register of deeds or the tax assessor’s office.)
- Estimating your maximum offer

Whether you plan on buying the property directly from the homeowners or at auction, you need to sit down and crunch the numbers. Your goal should be to earn 20% or more on your total investment. Begin with the estimated sales price of the home after repairs and renovations and work backward:

- Guesstimate how much you can sell the house for after repairs and renovations. (Base your guess on the recent sales prices of comparable homes in the same area. Guess low on price and high on costs.)
- Multiply the amount from step 1 by one of the following:
o .80 in a market where homes values are rising
o .70 to .75 in a market where home values are steady
o .65 to .75 in a market where home values are declining
o .50 to .65 depending on the percentage profit you want to make
- Subtract the amount of money required to pay off back taxes and other liens.
- Subtract the closing costs for purchasing the property.
- Subtract renovation expenses x 1.2 (to add 20% for unexpected cost overruns).
- Subtract monthly holding costs (interest, insurance, property taxes, utilities) times the number of months you plan on owning the house. Figure on at least 3 months.
- Subtract agent commissions and/or marketing and advertising costs.
- Subtract closing costs for selling the property.

For a calculator that can handle the calculations for you, visit http://www.getflipping.com.

Tip: If the numbers don’t work for you, you may be able to negotiate short sales with lenders, especially junior lien holders, who may lose everything if the property is sold. With a short sale, the lenders agree to accept less than the full amount they are owed.
This article provides a brief overview of what is a very complex process.

For more information about buying and selling preforeclosure and foreclosure properties, check out my book Foreclosure Investing For Dummies
.
Ralph R. Roberts, official spokesperson for Guthy-Renker Home and author of Flipping Houses For Dummies and Foreclosure Investing For Dummies (John Wiley & Sons), can be contacted at 586.751.0000, or by e-mail at RalphRoberts@RalphRoberts.com.

For more information, visit http://www.aboutralph.com.

Monday, July 09, 2007

Still afloat despite worst housing recession in 15 years

Mortgage market commentary
Monday, July 09, 2007

By Lou Barnes
Inman News

Mortgages have been remarkably stable in the 6.75 percent-6.875 percent area while the all-powerful 10-year T-note has run in a much wider range: 10 days ago touching 5.32 percent, on Tuesday trading briefly at 4.99 percent, and today an early burst to 5.22 percent.

Two lessons here. First, inject volatility into a system, as did the 10-year's rocket in June from 4.6 percent to the levels above and you'll have high volatility for quite a while. By "volatility" I mean true up-and-down action, not the Wall Street standard explanation to a client who has lost his shirt in a straight-line move.

Second, Treasury volatility versus stable mortgages is the signature of market uncertainty about the inflation/growth outlook, and grave concern about credit quality. In this week alone we've gone from strong buying of Treasurys in response to revelations of the magnitude of the mortgage-derivative mess to sell-everything-you've-got on news of a healthy economy.

The economic health is a bit of a puzzle. We've got the worst housing recession in at least 15 years (pending sales in May fell to the lowest level since September '01, a tough month), but its effects are still confined. Mortgage rates jumped a half percent in June, yet applications for mortgages are rock steady. The twin surveys by the purchasing managers' association appeared to be tailing, but both rebounded well in June, manufacturing to 56 from 55, services from 58 to a strong 60.7.

How are we pulling this off with oil at $70? Personal incomes are stagnant, in May a net loser after inflation. One big propellant in the early '00s was home-equity extraction: the Fed's newest numbers show home-equity-line-of-credit balances shrinking in the 1st quarter this year for the first time in modern memory. In Friday's news, June payrolls gained an as-expected and healthy 135,000 jobs, but April and May were revised way up, driving credit-frightened money back out of bonds just bought.

I do not have an answer to the "why" in our still-good economy, except that the globe overall is in the best economic health ever and helping to float our boat.

In the housing-mortgage furball, one of the deep fears for this stage was/is that a rapid retrenchment in credit standards would make a bad situation worse. When the credit pendulum swings all the way to one side, the return move rarely stops on sensible center. However, this time may be a first-ever. Mortgage terms and pricing are tougher than six months ago, and underwriters are running scared (especially in appraisal review), but pretty much everything available then still is today.

If you want a subprime horror, you can still have it: the FICO bar has gone from the 500s to 620-ish, roughly the minimum range that experienced landlords will consider acceptable for a tenant. The off-the-shelf piggybacks are as they were, except the 1st-to-2nd rate spread is about 1 percent wider (2 percent for sub-680 FICOs), causing little damage because the 2nds are so much smaller than the 1sts. "No-Docs" are still out there, spreads to "A" paper about a half-percent wider.

Stated-income, interest-only, "option" ARMs with negative amortization feature -- all unchanged except for FICO-rate relationship at the outer edge of applicant/deal strength. One hundred percent financing in general is harder to find, and pricey, but it should be.

Supply is still good for three reasons. First, most mortgages are good and safe investments. Second, the global credit markets are still desperate for yield and still don't grasp the extent of risk in edgy mortgage product; FICO-rate re-pricing will continue as that risk comes clear.

Third, the regulators, bless them, have failed altogether to tighten standards. Whether wise inaction during pendulum-swing, or near-total ineptitude, the mortgage underwriting "guidances" promulgated in the last year by the Fed (at the head of a puzzled mob: OFHEO, the FDIC, the Comptroller, the Office of Thrift Supervision, the National Credit Union Administration) have been completely ignored by the mortgage industry. A reasonable response, given equally complete lack of enforcement.

Lou Barnes is a mortgage broker and nationally syndicated columnist based in Boulder, Colo. He can be reached at lbarnes@boulderwest.com.

U.S. Housing Sales to Tumble to Six-Year Low on Rates (Update1)

By Kathleen M. Howley

July 9 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. home sales in 2007 will drop to their lowest level since the start of the five-year housing boom in 2001, as mortgage rates and foreclosures increase, according to a forecast by Freddie Mac.

Sales of new and previously owned homes probably will total 6.28 million, down 7.1 percent from last year, according to the world's second-largest mortgage buyer. It would be the lowest since 6.20 million homes were sold in 2001. Residential lending will drop to $2.75 trillion, the lowest since 2002, the McLean, Virginia-based company said in today's forecast.

Buyers are finding it more difficult to finance purchases because of higher mortgage rates and stricter lending standards, Freddie Mac said. The average U.S. rate for a 30-year fixed rate home loan probably will be 6.7 percent this quarter, according to the forecast. That's the highest level so far this year, and it's half a percentage point above the 6.2 percent average in the first three months of the year.

``Several risks -- the elevated levels of homes for sale, recent increases in mortgage rates, and rising foreclosures of subprime borrowers -- point to continued weakness in the months ahead,'' Freddie Mac Chief Economist Frank Nothaft said in the forecast.

The number of previously owned homes on the market reached a record 4.43 million in May, according to the National Association of Realtors. Sales fell to 5.99 million at an annualized pace, the lowest in four years, the real estate trade group said in a June 25 report.

Foreclosures Rise

The share of all mortgages entering foreclosure rose to 0.58 percent in the first quarter, the highest in a survey that goes back to 1972, the Mortgage Bankers Association said June 14. Subprime loans entering foreclosure rose to a five-year high of 2.43 percent, up from 2 percent, and prime loans rose to a record 0.25 percent.

The average U.S. fixed rate was 6.63 percent last week, up almost half a percentage point from 6.15 percent in early May, according to data from Freddie Mac, whose larger rival is Washington-based Fannie Mae.

U.S. home sales rose to a record 7.46 million in 2005 before dropping to 6.76 million last year, according to Freddie Mac. Demand will begin to rise next year, with about 6.39 million sales in 2008 and 6.63 million in 2009, the mortgage buyer said today.

To contact the reporter on this story: Kathleen M. Howley in Boston at kmhowley@bloomberg.net .

Last Updated: July 9, 2007 15:00 EDT

Friday, July 06, 2007

Strong jobs growth? Thank a tourist

Fri Jul 6, 2007 12:08PM EDT
Power. Price. Service. No Compromises.By Emily Kaiser

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The housing sector is in a funk, auto sales are weak, and manufacturing jobs are drying up. So why were Friday's employment numbers surprisingly strong?

Merrill Lynch analyst David Rosenberg says at least some of the credit should go to tourists who are flocking to the United States to capitalize on a weak dollar, helping to fill bars and restaurants.

"Where is all the employment being created? Try the leisure-hospitality sector -- the weak dollar has worked its magic in this space," Rosenberg wrote in a note to clients.

Friday's employment report from the Labor Department showed an overall gain of 132,000 jobs in June, beating economists' expectations for 120,000 in a Reuters survey.

Payroll figures for April and May were also revised higher, confirming stronger second-quarter economic growth following a soft start to the year.

Not surprisingly, nearly all the growth came in the services sector, which includes everything from nurses to bartenders and has been the sweet spot in an economy struggling with persistent weakness in manufacturing and housing.

Health care gets most of the attention in the services sector as aging baby boomers drive up demand for nursing, but a closer look at the latest numbers shows that food service and drinking places accounted for 34,600 new jobs in June, outpacing the 29,700 gain in health care employment.

"Foreigners cannot believe how cheap it is now to visit the U.S., with the U.S. dollar down 15 percent year-over-year against the Australian dollar and Thai baht; 10 percent against the (British pound) and 7.5 percent against the euro," Merrill's Rosenberg said.

While the data suggest that consumers were happily eating and drinking, the revelry did not extend to the shopping mall. The retail trade lost some 24,200 jobs, in part due to weakness at car dealerships and building supply stores but also because of declines at clothing and accessories stores.

"The mystery is they're adding folks in the food court and not the stores," said Ken Goldstein, labor economist with The Conference Board in New York.

Goldstein said that although the data is seasonally adjusted, it's not an exact science and the retail job losses may have as much to do with timing as demand.

He said restaurants probably beefed up staffing in response to signs the economy improved in the second quarter, and some people who had worried about a steep decline found reason to celebrate or travel.

Retailers are still a few weeks away from the back-to-school shopping season and will likely add jobs again in July, he said.

© Reuters 2007. All rights reserved.

Thursday, July 05, 2007

Foreclosure Zip Codes: Foreclosures drift to Sun Belt from Rust Belt

A new survey shows foreclosure clusters are on the move from industrial centers to coastal and southern states.
By Les Christie, CNNMoney.com staff writer,

NEW YORK -- For sheer volume, housing foreclosures across the nation appear to be moving from the Rust Belt to the Sun Belt.

A study for CNNMoney.com by RealtyTrac, an online marketer of foreclosure properties, showed that 139 of California's ZIP codes fell within the top 500 for total foreclosure filings in the United States. The next highest count for any state is less than half that at 72 and is in another sun-belt state - Florida.

Top 10 Foreclosure ZIP Codes
Zip City State Total Filings
44105 Cleveland OH 783
30310 Atlanta GA 709
80219 Denver CO 705
48228 Detroit MI 679
95823 Sacramento CA 634
48205 Detroit MI 634
48224 Detroit MI 583
89031 N. Las Vegas NV 575
80239 Denver CO 553
48219 Detroit MI 549

The geographic shift shows up in the mix of properties listed by the auction web site RealtyBid.com, which mainly features foreclosed homes.

RealtyBid spokeswoman, Daphne Shannon, said, "The Midwest has always been very solid for us, but the properties we're seeing are moving across the country - they're from California, Arizona and Nevada."

The number one ZIP code in the nation for foreclosures is still, however, in the Rust Belt. It's Cleveland, 44105, with a total of 784 filings during the three months ended June 15, according to the RealtyTrac study.

The hardest hit ZIP in California was Sacramento, 95823, where there were 634 default notices, repossessions and auction notices. It had the sixth most foreclosure filings for any zip code in the nation.

California boasts a vibrant economy and a fast growing population. According to Doug Duncan, chief economist for the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), foreclosures, overwhelmingly, used to come courtesy of serious underlying economic problems such as job layoffs or plant closings.

But the California foreclosure spike, as well as those in Florida, Arizona and Nevada, was set up by runaway appreciation that boosted home prices beyond affordability.

Double-digit price increases had attracted hordes of investors, who added to swiftly rising values. Developers bid up land prices in a scramble to get product to market. When markets cooled, speculators added to downward price pressure by unloading their properties onto already lengthening inventories.

"In many of these markets," said Duncan, "prices fell below what investors paid. Many have simply walked into their banks' offices and handed in their keys."

Many Sun-Belt buyers bought their high-priced houses using 2/28 adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) which featured very low initial, or "teaser," rates that reset much higher after the first two years of fixed payments.

But ARMs are best used, according to Duncan, as credit-repair products. They're set up for borrowers to show they can keep up mortgage payments and then refinance out into affordable fixed-rate loans after two years.

Many buyers used ARMs to get into a house with little regard for whether they could afford the payments, betting that rising prices could build enough home equity they could tap for cash.

When prices stabilized or fell, that safety valve disappeared. Owners couldn't pay monthly bills, and they had no equity to draw on.

In the Rust Belt, it was the ripple effects of a dying industrial economy instead of rampant speculation that crushed the finances of many borrowers in states like Michigan, Ohio and Indiana.

Neighborhoods of Cleveland 44105 were once filled with Eastern European immigrants and their descendents. Residents worked in nearby woolen factories and steel mills.

Today it's a mixed-race area with lower than average income, higher than average unemployment and a large stock of older, single-family homes. Many of them sell for less than $100,000, some for under $30,000.

According to Cleveland city councilman, Tony Branchatelli, who represents the district, more than 600 homes in the neighborhood are vacant and boarded up. Many have little value because the rehabilitation costs would exceed their selling prices. Some have had their plumbing, wiring and other hardware stripped.

In Sacramento, 95823, by contrast, residents depend more on government jobs and service industries for employment, although wages are still below average for the state.

Homes there are more modern and more valuable than in 44105; even modest three-bed/two bath houses go for several hundred thousand dollars.

Neither the Rust Belt nor Sun Belt are likely to see easier conditions any time soon. In the Sun Belt, the subprime mortgage mess will take many months to work through as the many borrowers who took out 2/28 and 3/27 ARMs during 2005 and 2006 will hit their reset points this year and next.

And the rust belt appears likely to endure more economic trouble before conditions turn around in heavy industry.

"Delinquencies," said Duncan, "will probably peak by the end of the year and foreclosures in 2008."

© 2007 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Real Estate Sees the Best of Times and the Worst of Times

TradingMarkets.com
Thursday July 5, 8:55 am ET
By TradingMarkets Research


Cheap debt and a boom in private equity have been key drivers for equities this year, even as the U.S. economy faces a stiff headwind from the deflation of the housing bubble. But all good things must come to an end. The outlook for deal flow is dimming as it gets harder for underwriters to place high-yield debt. Subprime problems at Bear Stearns (NYSE:BSC - News) have soured investors on high-yield debt, and the latest casualty came on July 5. A private equity firm had to resort to a bridge loan for $1.1 billion in financing for the leveraged buyout of ServiceMaster Co. (NYSE:SVM - News). This is a troubling sign, since U.S. equities will suffer if

Since real estate has been the key driver of this credit cycle, this week we look at REITs, which represent a broad range of subsectors. Even a cursory glance shows that real estate in America is now a tale of two cities, with boom times for downtown office space even as the suburbs go bust.

With apologies to Dickens, you could say that it is the best of times and the worst of times for U.S. real estate. Residential real estate continues to sag after peaking in 2005, while commercial real estate is hitting new highs. Office space on Park Avenue in Manhattan sold this week for $510 million, which comes to $1,600 per square foot. That is a record for commercial space in the U.S. Meanwhile, delinquencies on residential mortgages climbed to an 18-month high in the first quarter, and housing prices continue to decline.

The PowerRatings for REIT industries reflects this bifurcated outlook. The REIT industries with higher ratings are in Healthcare and Office space, both of which have bright fundamental outlooks. Pulling up the rear are Residential REITs. This group has a PowerRating of 2, which makes it one of our Industries to Avoid. Hotel/Motel REITs also have high exposure to the U.S. consumer, and it has a PowerRating (for Industries) of 2. In the short run, however, the Hotel/Motel industry got a boost on July 5 when Blackstone Group (NYSE:BX - News) announced a deal for Hilton Hotel (NYSE:HLT - News).

For investors who insist on exposure to real estate, it makes sense to stick with REITs that have the highest PowerRatings (for Industries). Right now this means commercial REITs such as Offices or Healthcare Facilities. Granted, these industries don't have high PowerRatings on an absolute basis. But they make better alternatives than the consumer-driven REITs at the bottom of our industry ratings. Our quantitative data from 1995 through 1996 have shown that PowerRatings do an excellent job for investors who seek high annualized returns over the next three months.

Unwinding Big Positions

Credit problems take a long time to fully emerge. Weaker borrowers suffer first, and then the problem spreads to stronger borrowers. And many mortgage derivatives are complex products, so it takes a while for credit defaults to show up in more complex products. That may be why subprime lending problems originally showed up at HSBC in February, yet it took until June for the hedge funds at Bear Stearns to take a hit.

Another issue is scale. Many bond investors have placed huge directional bets. High leverage is common in fixed income, and some hedge funds have levered their bond portfolios 10-to-1 or even 20-to-1. This means that even tiny declines in bond prices can have a devastating effect on capital.

This is a combustible situation. Bonds are less liquid than stocks, especially when prices are falling. Many of the more exotic bonds are not regularly priced, and portfolio managers don't want to create "fire sale" conditions that force them to mark to market at the worst possible time. This is another reason that it will take investors quite a while to fully unwind their positions.

Sticky Downward

There is yet one more reason that it takes a long time for real estate cycles to turn. People hate taking losses on their homes, so they just take them off the market. This makes real estate prices "sticky downward," which is how Keynes described wages (people don't like pay cuts, either). So the combination of forces is going to make this real estate cycle a protracted, messy affair. Real estate was the engine that drove the U.S. economy for many years. The engine stalled last year, and now it has become a slow-motion train wreck with no caboose in sight.

Rob Martorana, CFA, is Director of Content for PowerRatings.net.

Rob was most recently at TheStreet.com as the Director of Content for Professional Products. Rob has spent 22 years on Wall Street, and was a portfolio manager and head of U.S. equity research at Barclays Private Bank. Robert also managed small-cap stocks at Schroder Capital Management International, was an equity analyst at Vontobel USA, and was an editor and senior industry analyst for The Value Line Investment Survey.

Friday, June 29, 2007

Legends and tales taking blame for housing downturn

Mortgage market commentary
Friday, June 29, 2007

By Lou Barnes
Inman News

The 10-year T-note fell this week all the way to 5.05 percent from its 5.26 percent top two weeks ago. Long-term mortgage rates have settled today near 6.75 percent.

The interest rate decline has had several contributors. In approximate order of importance: fear of default on widening classes of ill-advised debt has pushed money to high-quality paper; a "retracement" from the crest of a big move is normal; and gradually improving inflation data are tilting the Fed from a tight stance toward balanced.

Lastly, regarding an accelerating U.S. economy: wait a minute fellas. Home sales are still falling, and unsold inventories are up to 8.9 months' supply, a 15-year record. Weakness in both consumer confidence and orders for durable goods put the second half of 2007 in question for anything much beyond 2 percent GDP growth.

Everyone is trying to form a housing forecast: how long, how deep, how bad will the collateral damage be? That is, everyone except for those who participated in the Great Derivatized Mortgage Train Robbery, who are doing their level best to keep everyone confused.

The forecasters have run out of metaphors. I'm waiting for these headlines: "Canary Found Dead in Iceberg," followed by "Tip of Coal Mine Feared." Meanwhile, the cover-uppers are selling a variety of urban legends and Tales of The West.

Legend Number One: Loosened standards in late 2005 and 2006 are responsible for the subprime damage, which will be limited to those loans. This is nonsense. We (and all other retailers) were offered the first suicide loans back in 2000, which then and now fall into two generic groups: 100 percent loan-to-value ratio in any form, with or without borrower documentation, and adjustable-rate mortgages with last-cigarette adjustment structure. The roll-out of these loans coincided exactly with Wall Street's discovery of "credit derivatives."

The ultimate foreclosure damage was masked by a decline in interest rates to a 50-year low, and a roaring, self-reinforcing run-up in home prices.

Legend Number Two: Fraud by Main Street lenders has been the main problem. It is a problem; it has always been a problem, and its depth is always discovered when home prices go flat. In today's parade of mortgage horrors, fraud is not even a secondary cause. Rather, the authentic causes (back to those two generic loan types) are: if you have no equity at purchase, and prices go flat, and anything goes wrong in your household, you're cooked. Prices went flat in 2005; that's the problem in '05-'06 loans, not easier credit.

Then there are the ARM-structure effects. In 2006, the Fed took short-term rates from the 1 perent bottom in 2002-2004 to 5.25 percent. ARM indices follow the Fed: in 2002-2004 a subprime borrower adjusting to 5 percent over Libor at the end of year two or three (the despicable "2/28s and 3/27s") only went to a 6 percent or 7 percent pay rate. Now, it's to 10 percent or 11 percent, a disaster having nothing to do with "eased standards" in 2005 and 2006 originations.

Tales of The West

Tale Number One: Housing will bottom out when home sellers finally reduce their prices enough. We better hope not because that would extinguish the equity in another 15 percent of households beyond the 15 percent that have little or none now.

Tale Number Two: Workouts, or negotiated loan modifications, will control the foreclosures. Foreclosure hotlines and counseling are doing excellent work, saving many families, but there is little negotiating room. One classic workout: add delinquent payments to the mortgage. It works if there is equity, but without any, the borrower is toast. Another is rate-reduction, which worked beautifully in the '80s (the FHA and VA "streamline refi") to rewrite 14-15 percent loans down to 8-9 percent. However, rate-reduction requires a lower market-rate world; today, rates are far higher than when the suicides were assisted. It may be possible to rewrite sky-high ARM adjustments, but only at the cost of deepening panic in the credit markets and cash flow collapsing. Take your poison, indolent regulators.

The next canary to hit the iceberg: S&P and Moody's are soon to be exposed in the worst systemic rating error ever. They are going to have to re-rate hundreds of billions of new-age mortgage paper, forcing institutions to acknowledge losses beyond estimation, and in doing so will admit their own fiduciary failure: fee for blindness.

Lou Barnes is a mortgage broker and nationally syndicated columnist based in Boulder, Colo. He can be reached at lbarnes@boulderwest.com.

***

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Big Apple, Southern cities tops in growth

USA'S LARGEST CITIES

City Population Change 2000-06

New York 8,214,426 205,750

Los Angeles 3,849,378 154,884

Chicago 2,833,321 -62,700

Houston 2,144,491 172,936

Phoenix 1,512,986 191,314

Philadelphia 1,448,394 -69,156

San Antonio 1,296,682 136,738

San Diego 1,256,951 33,535

Dallas 1,232,940 44,317

San Jose 929,936 34,619

Source: Census Bureau


By Dennis Cauchon and Paul Overberg, USA TODAY

The century-long quest of Americans to live in perpetual sunshine and far from snow shows no signs of letting up as surging growth infuses Sun Belt cities with new residents.

The Census Bureau reports today that seven of the 10 most populous U.S. cities are within 500 miles of Mexico. In 1910, all 10 of the biggest cities were within 500 miles of the Canadian border. The once-dominant industrial cities of Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Buffalo find themselves smaller than Mesa, Ariz., and Fresno.

The big exception to the smaller gains outside the Sun Belt is the Big Apple. New York City ranks No. 1 in attracting new residents since 2000, adding nearly 206,000 people. That's more than Phoenix, Houston or Los Angeles gained. Of the 35 cities that added the most population, New York is the only one not located in the South or West.

Economic prosperity and the arrival of new immigrants, who have higher birth rates than the overall population, are driving the city's growth. "It's written into the DNA of New York that immigrants are welcome," says Warren Brown of the Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research.

FIND MORE STORIES IN: Phoenix | Manhattan | Getty Images | Sun Belt | Gilbert | Big Apple | Empire State Building | Stan Honda
In a change more symbolic of national population trends, Phoenix has supplanted Philadelphia as the nation's fifth-largest city, according to Census estimates for July 1, 2006.

"It's hard to think of the cradle of liberty being overtaken by a rough-and-tumble, independent Western town, but that tells you something about the nature of our country," says Brookings Institution demographer William Frey. "We're a country that's always seeking new horizons."

The explosive growth in parts of the South and West has created boom cities that many people have never heard of. Gilbert, Ariz., a Phoenix suburb, has been adding more than 1,000 people a month for five years and had a population of 191,517 last year.

"It's fun. It's exciting to be growing this fast," says Gilbert Mayor Steve Berman, who moved to town in 1981 when the population was 4,000. "We're creating the coolest place to live."

By contrast, Green Bay, Wis., (100,353) has been losing population.

"We don't want to fall below 100,000," says Green Bay City Council President Chad Fradette. "That has a little prestige with it."

Other findings:

•Hurricane Katrina. New Orleans lost 261,286 residents from 2005 to 2006, dropping its population to 223,388 after Katrina. Gulfport, Miss., lost 7,988 residents to drop to 64,316.

•Suburbanization. Only 27% of Americans live in cities of 100,000 people or more, down from 27.5% in 2000, according to a USA TODAY analysis.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Home loan apps in 2-week slide

Real Estate Articles from Inman News

Index that tracks house purchases hit hardest
Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Declining interest rates weren't enough to inspire home purchases or refinancings last week, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported today, as loan applications were down again.

The market composite index, which measures total home loan volume, fell 3.9 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from the week before.

Home purchases saw the steepest drop-off in activity, as the purchase index sank 4.9 percent from the week before, following a 3 percent decline at mid-month. The index that tracks refinancings was down 2.5 percent last week, following a 4.2 percent drop two weeks ago.

The large decrease in purchase loans boosted the refinance share of mortgage applications to 38.7 percent last week and hiked the adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share to 20.4 percent.

Borrowing costs were either static or lower in the latest survey, with the average contract interest rate on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages holding at 6.6 percent, the average rate on the 15-year fixed-rate loan sinking to 6.24 percent from 6.28 percent, and the one-year ARM diving to 5.51 percent from 5.7 percent.

Points, or loan-processing fees expressed as a percent of the total loan amount, averaged 1.54 on the 30-year loans, 1.41 on the 15-year, and 1.14 on one-year ARMs. These points include the origination fee and are based on loan-to-value ratios of 80 percent.

The Mortgage Bankers Association survey covers approximately 50 percent of all U.S. retail residential mortgage originations, and has been conducted weekly since 1990. Respondents include mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts.

***

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

New home sales fell 1.6 percent in May

By Patrick Rucker

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Sales of new U.S. homes fell 1.6 percent in May to a lower-than-expected level while prices climbed from April, according to a government report on Tuesday that continued to point to weakness in the housing sector.

New single-family home sales fell to an annual rate of 915,000 from a downwardly revised rate of 930,000 in April, the Commerce Department said.

Analysts polled by Reuters were expecting May sales to fall to a 925,000 unit pace from a previously reported rate of 981,000 units in April.

In May, the median sales price of a new home rose 1.5 percent to $236,100 from $232,700 in April. Last month, new homes prices took a record tumble while sales rose strongly.

There were 536,000 new homes for sale in May, a fall from the 542,000 reported in April. It would take 7.1 months to clear that inventory at the current sales pace, more than the 7.0 months recorded in April.

U.S. Treasury debt prices and the dollar were little changed after a mixed batch of data, which in addition to the new homes report included news consumer confidence fell to a 10-month low in June while a manufacturing index of the Richmond Federal Reserve rose sharply in June from May.

Federal funds rate futures showed perceived chances of a Fed rate cut by year-end were slightly trimmed after the reports.

Tuesday's data came a day after another key report that measures the pace of existing home sales -- which represents 85 percent of the housing market. May home resales slipped to their lowest level in four years while the overstock of homes rose and prices dropped from their year-ago level for the 10th straight month.

New home sales were mixed across the regions, with the Midwest reporting the largest gain of 31 percent while the Northeast saw an 11 percent drop. The South saw a 7.3 percent drop while the West saw a decline of 1.9 percent.

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Americans still confident in home values: survey

Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:43PM EDT
By Mary Childs

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Although existing homes are selling at their slowest pace in four years, most Americans are confident their homes are worth more now than they were a year ago, according to a survey released on Thursday.

A poll conducted by the Boston Consulting Group found that 55 percent of Americans believe their house would sell for more money now than last year, compared with 59 percent who felt the same way last summer. Eighty-five percent expect their home to be worth even more in five years than it is now.

"It's a reasonable expectation. Markets neither boom nor bust forever," said David Berson, the chief economist with mortgage finance company Fannie Mae. "We're in a down period now, and I don't think it's going to end any time soon, but it will end long before five years is up."

Homeowners remain optimistic even though existing home sales last month hit their lowest rate since June 2003.

National surveys of home prices seem to bear out at least a degree of optimism, showing prices still rising, if only slowly.

According to the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, the average U.S. home price rose 4.3 percent over the year ended in the first quarter, the smallest gain in nearly a decade.

While record rates of homes entering foreclosures and weak sales figures have troubled analysts, 63 percent of the 1,007 homeowners surveyed still see real estate as a solid investment.

The softening housing market also appears to have had little impact on spending behavior. Seventy-six percent of participants in the nationwide telephone survey say it hasn't affected their spending at all.

"Talk of declining average values of homes is not forcing a cutback in spending," Michael Silverstein, senior partner at Boston Consulting, said in a statement. "It's just not translated into the American psyche."

Still, the survey, which was conducted between May 31 and June 3, showed concern among nearly half the participants that declining housing prices are hurting the national economy.

Most predict the slump will last two years. Even so, 69 percent of homeowners interviewed anticipate renovating their nest-egg in the next year.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

We should prepare now for dangerous global cooling

Let's interject a little rational thought into the climate change discussion:

"Read the sunspots

The mud at the bottom of B.C. fjords reveals that solar output drives climate change - and that we should prepare now for dangerous global cooling

R. TIMOTHY PATTERSON, Financial Post
Published: Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Politicians and environmentalists these days convey the impression that climate-change research is an exceptionally dull field with little left to discover. We are assured by everyone from David Suzuki to Al Gore to Prime Minister Stephen Harper that "the science is settled." At the recent G8 summit, German Chancellor Angela Merkel even attempted to convince world leaders to play God by restricting carbon-dioxide emissions to a level that would magically limit the rise in world temperatures to 2C.

Forget warming, beware the new ice age

The fact that science is many years away from properly understanding global climate doesn't seem to bother our leaders at all. Inviting testimony only from those who don't question political orthodoxy on the issue, parliamentarians are charging ahead with the impossible and expensive goal of "stopping global climate change." Liberal MP Ralph Goodale's June 11 House of Commons assertion that Parliament should have "a real good discussion about the potential for carbon capture and sequestration in dealing with carbon dioxide, which has tremendous potential for improving the climate, not only here in Canada but around the world," would be humorous were he, and even the current government, not deadly serious about devoting vast resources to this hopeless crusade.

Climate stability has never been a feature of planet Earth. The only constant about climate is change; it changes continually and, at times, quite rapidly. Many times in the past, temperatures were far higher than today, and occasionally, temperatures were colder. As recently as 6,000 years ago, it was about 3C warmer than now. Ten thousand years ago, while the world was coming out of the thou-sand-year-long "Younger Dryas" cold episode, temperatures rose as much as 6C in a decade -- 100 times faster than the past century's 0.6C warming that has so upset environmentalists.

Climate-change research is now literally exploding with new findings. Since the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, the field has had more research than in all previous years combined and the discoveries are completely shattering the myths. For example, I and the first-class scientists I work with are consistently finding excellent correlations between the regular fluctuations in the brightness of the sun and earthly climate. This is not surprising. The sun and the stars are the ultimate source of all energy on the planet.

My interest in the current climate-change debate was triggered in 1998, when I was funded by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council strategic project grant to determine if there were regular cycles in West Coast fish productivity. As a result of wide swings in the populations of anchovies, herring and other commercially important West Coast fish stock, fisheries managers were having a very difficult time establishing appropriate fishing quotas. One season there would be abundant stock and broad harvesting would be acceptable; the very next year the fisheries would collapse. No one really knew why or how to predict the future health of this crucially important resource.

Although climate was suspected to play a significant role in marine productivity, only since the beginning of the 20th century have accurate fishing and temperature records been kept in this region of the northeast Pacific. We needed indicators of fish productivity over thousands of years to see whether there were recurring cycles in populations and what phenomena may be driving the changes.

My research team began to collect and analyze core samples from the bottom of deep Western Canadian fjords. The regions in which we chose to conduct our research, Effingham Inlet on the West Coast of Vancouver Island, and in 2001, sounds in the Belize-Seymour Inlet complex on the mainland coast of British Columbia, were perfect for this sort of work. The topography of these fjords is such that they contain deep basins that are subject to little water transfer from the open ocean and so water near the bottom is relatively stagnant and very low in oxygen content. As a consequence, the floors of these basins are mostly lifeless and sediment layers build up year after year, undisturbed over millennia.

Using various coring technologies, we have been able to collect more than 5,000 years' worth of mud in these basins, with the oldest layers coming from a depth of about 11 metres below the fjord floor. Clearly visible in our mud cores are annual changes that record the different seasons: corresponding to the cool, rainy winter seasons, we see dark layers composed mostly of dirt washed into the fjord from the land; in the warm summer months we see abundant fossilized fish scales and diatoms (the most common form of phytoplankton, or single-celled ocean plants) that have fallen to the fjord floor from nutrient-rich surface waters. In years when warm summers dominated climate in the region, we clearly see far thicker layers of diatoms and fish scales than we do in cooler years. Ours is one of the highest-quality climate records available anywhere today and in it we see obvious confirmation that natural climate change can be dramatic. For example, in the middle of a 62-year slice of the record at about 4,400 years ago, there was a shift in climate in only a couple of seasons from warm, dry and sunny conditions to one that was mostly cold and rainy for several decades.

Using computers to conduct what is referred to as a "time series analysis" on the colouration and thickness of the annual layers, we have discovered repeated cycles in marine productivity in this, a region larger than Europe. Specifically, we find a very strong and consistent 11-year cycle throughout the whole record in the sediments and diatom remains. This correlates closely to the well-known 11-year "Schwabe" sunspot cycle, during which the output of the sun varies by about 0.1%. Sunspots, violent storms on the surface of the sun, have the effect of increasing solar output, so, by counting the spots visible on the surface of our star, we have an indirect measure of its varying brightness. Such records have been kept for many centuries and match very well with the changes in marine productivity we are observing.

In the sediment, diatom and fish-scale records, we also see longer period cycles, all correlating closely with other well-known regular solar variations. In particular, we see marine productivity cycles that match well with the sun's 75-90-year "Gleissberg Cycle," the 200-500-year "Suess Cycle" and the 1,100-1,500-year "Bond Cycle." The strength of these cycles is seen to vary over time, fading in and out over the millennia. The variation in the sun's brightness over these longer cycles may be many times greater in magnitude than that measured over the short Schwabe cycle and so are seen to impact marine productivity even more significantly.

Our finding of a direct correlation between variations in the brightness of the sun and earthly climate indicators (called "proxies") is not unique. Hundreds of other studies, using proxies from tree rings in Russia's Kola Peninsula to water levels of the Nile, show exactly the same thing: The sun appears to drive climate change.

However, there was a problem. Despite this clear and repeated correlation, the measured variations in incoming solar energy were, on their own, not sufficient to cause the climate changes we have observed in our proxies. In addition, even though the sun is brighter now than at any time in the past 8,000 years, the increase in direct solar input is not calculated to be sufficient to cause the past century's modest warming on its own. There had to be an amplifier of some sort for the sun to be a primary driver of climate change.

Indeed, that is precisely what has been discovered. In a series of groundbreaking scientific papers starting in 2002, Veizer, Shaviv, Carslaw, and most recently Svensmark et al., have collectively demonstrated that as the output of the sun varies, and with it, our star's protective solar wind, varying amounts of galactic cosmic rays from deep space are able to enter our solar system and penetrate the Earth's atmosphere. These cosmic rays enhance cloud formation which, overall, has a cooling effect on the planet. When the sun's energy output is greater, not only does the Earth warm slightly due to direct solar heating, but the stronger solar wind generated during these "high sun" periods blocks many of the cosmic rays from entering our atmosphere. Cloud cover decreases and the Earth warms still more.

The opposite occurs when the sun is less bright. More cosmic rays are able to get through to Earth's atmosphere, more clouds form, and the planet cools more than would otherwise be the case due to direct solar effects alone. This is precisely what happened from the middle of the 17th century into the early 18th century, when the solar energy input to our atmosphere, as indicated by the number of sunspots, was at a minimum and the planet was stuck in the Little Ice Age. These new findings suggest that changes in the output of the sun caused the most recent climate change. By comparison, CO2 variations show little correlation with our planet's climate on long, medium and even short time scales.

In some fields the science is indeed "settled." For example, plate tectonics, once highly controversial, is now so well-established that we rarely see papers on the subject at all. But the science of global climate change is still in its infancy, with many thousands of papers published every year. In a 2003 poll conducted by German environmental researchers Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch, two-thirds of more than 530 climate scientists from 27 countries surveyed did not believe that "the current state of scientific knowledge is developed well enough to allow for a reasonable assessment of the effects of greenhouse gases." About half of those polled stated that the science of climate change was not sufficiently settled to pass the issue over to policymakers at all.

Solar scientists predict that, by 2020, the sun will be starting into its weakest Schwabe solar cycle of the past two centuries, likely leading to unusually cool conditions on Earth. Beginning to plan for adaptation to such a cool period, one which may continue well beyond one 11-year cycle, as did the Little Ice Age, should be a priority for governments. It is global cooling, not warming, that is the major climate threat to the world, especially Canada. As a country at the northern limit to agriculture in the world, it would take very little cooling to destroy much of our food crops, while a warming would only require that we adopt farming techniques practiced to the south of us.

Meantime, we need to continue research into this, the most complex field of science ever tackled, and immediately halt wasted expenditures on the King Canute-like task of "stopping climate change."

R. Timothy Patterson is professor and director of the Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Centre, Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University."

Home loan apps decline

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Inman News

Fewer borrowers chose to take out loans for home purchases and refinancings last week even as long-term mortgage rates ended a monthlong climb, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported today.

The drop-off in activity pushed the market composite index -- a measure of mortgage application volume -- down 3.4 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from the week before.

Applications for refinancings declined 4.2 percent from the first week of June, and the index that tracks home purchases was down 3 percent.

Borrowing costs on long-term loans were fairly calm in the latest survey, with the average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages dipping to 6.6 percent from 6.61 percent a week earlier and the average rate on the 15-year fixed holding at 6.28 percent.

Costs on the one-year ARM, however, jumped from 5.48 percent to 5.7 percent during the period, boosting the ARM share of total applications to 20.3 percent from 18.7 percent a week earlier. The refi share of activity held at 38 percent, MBA reported.

Points, or loan-processing fees expressed as a percent of the total loan amount, averaged 1.58 on the 30-year loans, 1.42 on the 15-year, and 1.16 on one-year ARMs. Statistics, which include the origination fee, are based on loan-to-value ratios of 80 percent.

The Mortgage Bankers Association survey covers approximately 50 percent of all U.S. retail residential mortgage originations, and has been conducted weekly since 1990. Respondents include mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts.

***

Expand Your Living Space ... Outdoors

(Courtesy of AOL)

Jun 15th 2007 12:34PM

Everyone seems to be into home makeovers. How could you not after watching an episode of the tear-jerking 'Extreme Makeover: Home Edition'? And do you remember 'Trading Spaces'? Is that show still on?

It seems like now the trend is all about outdoor living. One of the latest home catalogs that I received features an outdoor kitchen, complete with stainless steel grill and other cooking appliances. Of course, there's an outdoor wet bar and a beautiful dining set overlooking the lush garden and fountain. Maybe that's great if you live in California. But the East Coast humidity may just kill the fun of cooking and dining outside.

Regardless of how I feel, I can't deny that expanding living space outdoors is hot right now. Just look at the list of top searched outdoor living, the term "outdoor kitchens" is tops on our list. This definitely piques my curiosity and maybe I'll stop throwing away that outdoor living catalog!

So what have you done to expand your living space outdoors? Any tips and pointers?

This month's top searched outdoor living terms on AOL Search:
1) Patio furniture
2) Hot tubs
3) Patio umbrellas
4) Outdoor kitchens
5) Outdoor lighting
6) Swimming pool
7) Outdoor rugs
8) Patio cushions
9) Patio doors
10) Grill

To check out more outdoor living ideas, go to AOL Shopping and for more tips and ideas, search for outdoor living spaces on AOL Search.
Posted by Mia

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Economist expects U.S. home prices to fall 10%

Forecast says no recession, but 'certainly close'
Tuesday, June 19, 2007

By Glenn Roberts Jr.
Inman News

Turbulence.

That is the one-word title for the latest U.S. economic forecast by David Shulman of the Anderson Forecast at the University of California, Los Angeles.

"This is not a recession, but it is certainly close," Shulman writes in the forecast, released today. "If our forecast is close to the mark, the period from the second quarter of 2006 to the first quarter of 2008 will mark a historically anomalous long period of below-trend growth."

Shulman's previous quarterly forecast report, released in April, was titled, "A Long Runway for the Soft Landing."

His latest forecast anticipates a 10 percent peak-to-trough price decline in U.S. housing prices "that will likely extend into 2009."

In an interview this week with Inman News, Shulman said the current real estate downturn is "completely different from anything we've previously experienced," adding that the only comparable period may be the Great Depression.

"We've never had the run-up in house prices we saw between 2000 and 2005," and the housing-market slump is likely to be similarly unprecedented, he said.

A rise in foreclosures and the withering of the subprime lending market are still "in the early innings," he said, and foreclosure outlook is expected to get worse "well into 2008."

There may be statistical errors with U.S. gross domestic product numbers, the report notes, and recent real GDP growth may have been understated.

While some economists expected the Federal Reserve to cut the federal funds rate to prop up the ailing housing market, worries about inflation risks have perhaps taken precedent, Shulman noted in his report.

"We do not expect much help from monetary policy until the fourth quarter," Shulman stated in his report, and this "delay will push back the housing recovery until well until 2008."

His forecast calls for the Federal Reserve to cut the federal funds rate from a current level of 5.25 percent to 4.5 percent, with the reductions beginning in fourth-quarter 2007.

The rate of housing starts is expected to average 1.35 million units in 2007 and 1.43 million in 2008, according to the report.

Weakness in the housing market "is finally spilling over into consumption spending," the report states, and the U.S. economy has transitioned from "locomotive" to "caboose" among global economies.

"Today, Europe and Japan are strong and the U.S. is lagging. With the Euro-area expected to grow at 2.6 percent, the United Kingdom at 2.7 percent and Japan at 2.4 percent, our estimate of 1.8 percent (for the United States) is the laggard.

"Furthermore, China continues to grow at a blistering double-digit pace and India is not too far behind," the report states, and the global economy "is powering the stock market to new highs."

U.S. export growth, growth in business investment and especially commercial structures, and continued spending by wealthy consumers "will keep the U.S. out of recession in 2007," Shulman expects. The housing decline should be behind us by mid-2008, he states.

In a separate report focused on California, economist Ryan Ratcliff stated, "So far, 2007 has been a bit of a puzzle in the California economy. Falling sales, weak prices and rising foreclosures have continued to rule the local housing markets, and both national and state measures of construction activity suggest that real estate has been a drag on economic growth for close to a year now.

"But in spite of all this bad news from real estate, the wider California economy is mostly unfazed: job growth has slowed only slightly and we've seen only a minor uptick in unemployment."

About 27 percent of all job creation in the state from 2003-05 was from the construction sector, compared with about 11 percent from 1990-2005, the report states.

While previous forecasts anticipated "significant job loss" for the construction sector, Ratcliff notes in his report that construction has remained flat since early 2006, while the real estate finance sector "has lost enough jobs in 2006 to bring growth in financial activities to a halt."

Mortgage-related industries have seen significant job losses in the past 12 months, the report states.

Strength of the commercial building industry may have served to buoy construction employment during this residential decline, the report suggests.

Shulman also said that there may be an issue with immigrant workers in the construction industry "getting paid off the books."

Ratcliff's report expects a combination of job losses in construction and real estate finance to hit home during the rest of this year and in early 2008, pulling down overall payroll job growth in the state to less than 1 percent for the next five quarters. The report also expects a rise in unemployment to 5.5 percent.

Ratcliff states that there are some mixed signals for real estate in California, such as a decline in median sales price of about 10 percent in some counties over the past year, "but some counties have actually seen appreciation accelerate in the last six months, and median sales prices for larger geographies are universally higher."

The median sales price in the state hit an all-time high of $484,000 in April, he noted, while a home-price gauge by a government agency fell for two consecutive quarters.

Homes that have moved all the way through a foreclosure process "are rapidly approaching highs not seen since the 1990s, and several counties have surpassed their previous highs." But despite surging foreclosure sales, "resale prices have been largely unfazed," the report states.

Ratcliff expects that, based on the lengthy pipeline of mortgage resets, the state's housing market may not return to normal until mid-2009. And that return to normalcy could come as soon as mid-2008, based on historical building-cycle data, he states.

"Unfortunately, both of these perspectives argue that things in the housing market will get worse before they get better. While we don't see any calamitous implosion of home prices in the near future, this patter of flat to slight falling prices and weak sales volumes will be the norm for some time to come."

***

Send tips or a Letter to the Editor to glenn@inman.com, or call (510) 658-9252, ext. 137.

Copyright 2007 Inman News

U.S. Economy: Housing Starts Drop; Slump May Persist (Update5)

By Bob Willis

June 19 (Bloomberg) -- Home starts in the U.S. fell for the first time in four months in May as interest rates rose, suggesting the worst housing recession in 16 years will persist.

Builders broke ground on new houses at an annual rate of 1.474 million, down 2.1 percent from the prior month, the Commerce Department said today in Washington. Building permits increased 3 percent to 1.501 million.

The slump, which has lasted almost two years, is restraining economic growth even as inflation is too high for the comfort of Federal Reserve officials. Meanwhile, the average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage has jumped to the highest in more than a year, putting pressure on first-time buyers and raising the prospect of additional defaults.

``There is still some more downside to the housing market,'' said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at Global Insight Inc. in New York. ``Mortgage rates started up again and there is still a shakeout going on in subprime.''

Behravesh came closest to predicting the drop in starts among 68 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. The median forecast was for a decline to a 1.472 million pace.

The housing industry is also wrestling with soaring foreclosures among subprime borrowers -- those with poor or incomplete credit histories. Lower prices and more incentives have failed to spur interest as buyers wait for bigger bargains.

Yields on Treasury notes fell and stocks were little changed. The yield on the benchmark 10-year note was 5.08 percent at 2 p.m. in New York. A six-week rout pushed the yield to a five-year high of 5.32 percent on June 13.

Weakness in West

The drop in starts was led by a 20 percent slump in the West. Construction also fell 1.6 percent in the South. Starts rose 16 percent in both the Northeast and Midwest.

Housing's recession cut 0.9 percentage point from growth in the first quarter after detracting 1.2 percentage points in the second half of 2006.

The drop in homebuilding slowed economic growth to a 0.6 percent annual rate in the first quarter, the weakest in four years. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg forecast the economy will grow 2.1 percent this year, compared with an average of 3.1 percent over the last three decades.

Borrowing Costs

The average rate on a 30-year fixed rate mortgage rose to 6.74 percent last week, according to figures from Freddie Mac, the No.2 buyer of U.S. mortgages. The increase reflected expectations of faster global growth and fears inflation would accelerate. The rate averaged 6.22 percent last month and 6.18 percent in April.

Starts were down 24 percent in the 12 months ended in May.

``The trend down is still intact,'' said Kevin Logan, senior market economist at Dresdner Kleinwort in New York, who forecast a fall to 1.47 million units. ``The housing contraction is going to be a drag for the rest of the year.''

Construction of single-family homes fell 3.4 percent last month to a 1.17 million rate. Work on multifamily homes, such as townhouses and apartment buildings, increased 3.1 percent to an annual rate of 304,000, the most this year.

The increase in permits was led by a jump in multifamily authorizations. Permits for single-family homes dropped 1.8 percent to a 1.05 million annual pace, the lowest since July 1997.

``We continue to see a deterioration in demand for single- family homes, and so it looks like there's more downside to go for the housing market,'' said Tim McGee, chief economist at U.S. Trust Corp. in New York.

Unsold Homes

Record levels of unsold homes suggest the slump is far from over. Fed policy makers now acknowledge the housing recession may linger longer than previously forecast.

``The adjustment in the housing sector is still ongoing, and the slowdown in residential construction now appears likely to remain a drag on economic growth for somewhat longer than previously expected,'' Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said June 5.

A record number of Americans were at risk of losing their homes last quarter because they couldn't make payments as interest rates rose and growth slowed, according to a report last week from the Mortgage Bankers Association. The share of all mortgages entering foreclosure rose to 0.58 percent from 0.54 percent in the fourth quarter.

The failure of at least 50 subprime lenders, who make loans to consumers with poor or limited credit history, combined with the increase in foreclosures has raised concern more homes will be thrown back on the market.

Subprime

Some banks have made it more difficult for borrowers to qualify for a mortgage in the wake of the subprime debacle. Add the jump in rates, and affordability has taken a hit.

Declines in sales, construction and prices this year are going to be steeper than previously thought, the National Association of Realtors said June 6, in its fourth forecast revision this year. Housing starts are likely to fall 21 percent to 1.43 million from 1.8 million last year, the group said.

Sales of previously owned homes probably will tumble 4.6 percent to 6.18 million and the median price likely will fall 1.3 percent to $219,100, the Chicago-based trade group said. A month earlier, the association projected 2007 home sales to decline 2.9 percent. Sales of new homes will fall to 860,000 from 1.05 million last year, the group said.

A report yesterday showed builders turned more pessimistic this month. The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo sentiment index dropped to 28, a 16-year low, from 30 in May. Readings below 50 mean most respondents view conditions as poor.

`Really Worried'

``Builders are really worried now, not only by the credit tightening in the mortgage market, but now all of a sudden by an increase in the fundamental mortgages as well,'' David Seiders, chief economist at the National Association of Homebuilders, said in an interview yesterday.

Hovnanian Enterprises Inc., New Jersey's largest homebuilder, last month reported its third consecutive quarterly loss as it cut prices and wrote off land options while sales continued to plummet.

``Without a doubt, things have slowed since about March,'' said Ara Hovnanian, the builder's chief executive officer in an interview yesterday. ``There is not a recovery that is about to happen.''

To contact the reporter on this story: Bob Willis in Washington bwillis@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: June 19, 2007 15:19 EDT

Top Searched States for Real Estate

(Courtesy of Mia at AOL)

Jun 18th 2007 3:06PM

I have lived in the Washington, D.C., metro area for almost 10 years. That is an eternity for me! I used to move every four to five years. So once in a while, I get the itch to look at other cities and states to see what's out there. But for one reason or another, I always end up staying here.

I was curious to see what states people search for when they're looking to move. It's no surprise that Florida real estate and North Carolina real estate are at the top. The warm weather and low cost of living certainly help. It could also be people looking for a second home. However, I was surprised to see that Maine real estate made it second on the list -- is there something about Maine that I don't know about?

For now, I think I'll stay in the D.C. area since it is a nice place to live. The humidity doesn't bother me and there are plenty of good restaurants around. People are generally friendly -- probably those Southerners who moved up north (although technically Washington, D.C., is in the south). Most importantly, my family and friends are in the area, and that's a huge incentive to stick around here.

How about you? Do you constantly look at real estate in other states? If you recently moved out of state, why did you move? Or, maybe you have your own list of states you're checking out ... if so, please share!

Top searched states for real estate on AOL Search:
1) Florida real estate
2) Maine real estate
3) North Carolina real estate
4) Arkansas real estate
5) Hawaii real estate
6) Tennessee real estate
7) Texas real estate
8) Delaware real estate
9) Utah real estate
10) Arizona real estate